We have recently got our hands on a leaked hands-on video of Google’s upcoming mid-range smartphone, the Pixel 9a. Captured on video and promptly yanked down (but not before being widely shared again on the internet), it reveals a design that has triggered criticism over its visual charm, with many deeming it “cheap looking” when compared to the company’s previous A-series phones.
A Shift in Design Philosophy?
The Pixel 9a is expected to follow in the footsteps of its predecessors, which are known for bringing Google’s flagship experience at a lower price. Rumors indicate the device will feature some solid hardware, with a Tensor G4 processor, up to 8GB of RAM, and a 120Hz OLED screen. It seems a decision to tighten belts and cut costs influenced the materials used and design generally, and reviews are mixed.
Material Matters: The Core of the Controversy
The leaked video highlighted the “Obsidian (black)” model of the Pixel 9a, drawing attention to the rear panel’s texture, which some have criticized as inferior to that of the Pixel 7a and 8a. This change marks a significant departure from previous iterations, which generally maintained a consistent level of build quality.
Shane Craig, a noted tech analyst, commented on the design, saying, “It looks cheap, but the actual feel in hand is decent, reminiscent of the Nokia Lumia’s texture.” The primary design critique centers around the camera bar, which now features a “plastic ring” unlike the metal used in earlier models, potentially accentuating the cheaper aesthetic.
Upcoming Launch and Consumer Expectations
The official announcement of the Pixel 9a is expected around late March. The hardware specs are promising, but the community is eager to see how this new design philosophy will appeal to consumers. The real question will be how the phone feels and works in practice, which could smooth over some of the aesthetic complaints at first blush.
Conclusion
The Pixel 9a does appear ready to impress on the technical side, though, as its design has certainly passionate discussion panel with a debate. Whether this will affect its success remains to be seen. As always, the proof will be in the pudding—or in this case, in the hand, once the device goes official and hits the shelves.
Engage with Us: What are your thoughts on the evolving design choices of smartphone manufacturers? Are cost-cutting measures justifiable if they lead to lower prices, or should aesthetic quality be maintained? Share your views in the comments below!
